Cristiano Ronaldo’s legal fight against a woman who accuses the Juventus star of raping her in his suite at a Las Vegas resort more than 10 years ago is heading toward a trial before a federal judge in Nevada.
No date was immediately set, but US district judge Jennifer Dorsey said she will hear arguments and decide herself whether Kathryn Mayorga was mentally fit to enter a 2010 hush-money agreement with Ronaldo’s representatives that paid Mayorga $375,000.
Ronaldo’s attorney, Peter Christiansen, declined to comment on Tuesday. Mayorga’s lawyers, led by Leslie Mark Stovall, have yet to respond to the judge’s ruling, which was issued on 30 September.
A judge ruled in 2019 that there is not enough evidence for Cristiano Ronaldo to face criminal charges over the allegations.
Dorsey wrote that a court should decide whether Mayorga “lacked the mental capacity” to sign a confidentiality arrangement with Ronaldo’s representatives and “whether any agreement … was ever formed between the parties.”
It was not immediately clear whether Ronaldo or Mayorga will have to be in court in person when a trial is held.
After filing her lawsuit against Ronaldo in October 2018, Mayorga gave consent through her attorneys to be identified.
Dorsey gave both sides until the end of November to agree upon a plan for a bench trial.
The ruling represents a setback for Ronaldo’s legal representatives, who have so far kept details of the 2010 settlement sealed. Questions around the case that US magistrate judge Daniel Albregts said in February belonged behind closed doors will now be heard in a public court. US district judges can overrule magistrate judges, who handle court filings and pretrial arguments.
Mayorga, 37, is a former teacher and model who lives in the Las Vegas area. She states in her lawsuit that Ronaldo or his associates violated the confidentiality agreement by allowing reports about it to appear in European publications in 2017. She seeks to collect at least $200,000 more from Ronaldo.
Ronaldo’s lawyers maintain that media reports were based on electronic data illegally hacked, stolen and sold by cyber criminals. They say they believe documents have been altered and complain that Mayorga’s lawsuit damages Ronaldo’s reputation.
Mayorga says she met Ronaldo at a nightclub in 2009 and went with him and other people to his hotel suite, where her lawsuit alleges he assaulted her in a bedroom. She was 25 at the time; he was 24. Ronaldo, through his lawyers, maintains the sex was consensual.
Stovall says Mayorga had learning disabilities as a child, was pressured by Ronaldo’s representatives and lacked the legal capacity to sign a nondisclosure agreement.
The judge declined, at least for now, to name Mayorga’s brother as her guardian for the case. Dorsey also said some disputes could be resolved out of court.
“The court must decide whether Mayorga lacked the mental capacity to assent to the settlement agreement,” Dorsey wrote.
If Mayorga was fit to enter the agreement, the judge said, it binds her to confidentiality and an arbitrator’s decision behind closed doors about whether the contract was legal and valid.